Now I have realized that I should have done these blogs by genre and not random like this. But it is what it is, just skip the movies you don’t care about. I’m gonna mix it up a little western, science fiction, horror …
The Magnificent Seven I know it is a remake, but it is a very good one, turning Japanese samurai story (七人の侍 Shichinin no Samurai originally written and directed by Akira Kurosawa) into western was really a good idea. Since I’m a bit lazy with subtitles, although I love Japanese language, I have seen Seven Samurai only once, but have seen it’s remake The Magnificent Seven at least 10 times. I totally approve of this version. And it doesn’t feel, to me, that Sturges has taken someone else’s work, as it does in many remakes. It feels to me like he took a good idea and made it more welcoming to viewers who speak/know English. Also with this western twist it looks very well with in the western movie genre. He hit a bulls eye. And I love it! As I have mentioned before I grew up watching westerns every summer (since I was 7 years old, reruns on TV, while school was out,). So I get emotional about it all. But Hollywood sometimes has nice surprises when they remake movies that do not originate from English speaking countries (Girl With The Dragon Tattoo and Let Me In remake of Let The Right One In are not one of those).
The magnificent cast (see what I did there ;)): Yul Brynner, Eli Wallach, Steve McQueen, Charles Bronson, Robert Vaughn, Horst Buchholz and James Coburn, dream team! If you grew up watching westerns and WWII movies you’d be in love with this cast ❤ The guy from West World, and guy from Death wish, Once Upon a Time in the West, The Dirty Dozen then joined with another two in The Great Escape, they just keep acting together and I just keep enjoying … that what my childhood was like. Me my old black and white TV and these guys 😀 who needs the real world? What’s real anyway? If you have not seen these movies that let me tell you my reader: You know nothing 😛
So it was my father’s birthday yesterday and I took him to see new The Magnificent Seven (2016). We have talked about Benh-Hur last weekend and he had the same reaction as me: “Not even going to watch that shit!” Genetics are wonderful thing some time. And then asked if he heard about The Magnificent Seven remake, he said no, but wanted to hear the cast, all well known to me but what seal the deal with my dad was Denzel Washington. And you know the rest 😉
SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT!
Well you decided to read anyway, ha?
The Magnificent Seven 2016 rocked, kicked ass … at has logged itself in my heart right next to the old one. Mr Antoine Fuqua and Mr Nic Pizzolatto with Mr Richard Wenk have done Kurosawa and Sturges a righteous remake. Hat’s of guys. Casting was impeccable just like in the 1960. movie. Vincent D’Onofrio and Chris Pratt died almost as good as Sean Bean as Boromir (btw one of my favorite death scenes by Mr Sean Bean, and we all know he dies a lot ;)). Two war time rivals now buddies Denzel Washington as Chisolm and Ethan Hawke as Goodnight Robicheaux were great, as was Byung-hun Lee as Robicheauxs’ side kick Billy Rocks. (I have seen lots of movies, mostly Korean< with him and he always surprises me, just love to watch him act). I was also very pleasantly surprised with Martin Sensmeier and Manuel Garcia-Rulfo because I didn’t know them as well as others. And also I was very worried about their survival rate, you know how it goes … don’t want to get political, again. And honorable mention to Mr Matt Bomer and Haley Bennett could hold her own among the guys and make a little room for herself, very nice job. Could have been a little less revealing, but that was the choice Fuqua made. And I for me it’s the only thing he did wrong. Widowed god-fearing woman seeking revenge for husband she loved very much, looking to hire gunslingers, little bit scared from time to time, of rough men does not dress that way. But all in all a great movie. And if you wanna remake shit this is how it’s done.
I have covered the good one and now let’s talk about a bad one.
Still don’t know why people try to mess with god things and great movies. I know that you “young’ directors want to prove yourselves but try doing it with something new and do not try to make your name a cross someone else’s back. I know and love John Carpenter movies, and obviously other do too, but we don’t like those remakes (yes, I also mean Carpenters remake of Village of the Damned, sorry John but not your best work, but I was bound to happen). Again why mess with the works of genius like Carpenter.
Today I’m gonna be writing against The Thing from 2011. We all can read and see the name of the defiler of The Thing (1982) Matthijs van Heijningen hiding under prequel movie, like I care that it’s under the guise of “prequel”. The question is why? WHY? Did you think you could contribute to the genre? Did you think that your cast can ever be better than Carpenters cast?
Like you could beat this: Kurt Russell, Wilford Brimley, T. K. Carter, David Clennon, Keith David, Richard Dysart, Charles Hallahan, and so on. Did you think that shaggy dog like Eric Christian Olsen should be in this movie, will be an asset for this movie. EEEE WRONG! (why directors keep employing this guy is beyond me). Or maybe you thought that your score could be better than Ennio Morricone? It’s not about new special effect, it’s not about we can make it better. It is just that you don’t have an idea and want to exploit someone else’s work. You’ll never come close to Carpenter. Just should have found another project to make your bones.
A little trivia courtesy of IMDb: “This movie has become part of the culture in Antarctica. It is a long standing tradition in all British Antarctic research stations to watch The Thing (1982) as part of their Midwinter feast and celebration held every June 21.” And let me tell you, you just don’t mess with that 😉